Mantashe says his department will intervene at Jagersfontein despite court exemption

Minister of mineral resource Gwede Mantashe during a walkabout in Charlesville to inspect the damage caused to homes after the mudslide from the Jagersfontein Development mine dam damaged houses and infrastructure.
Minister of mineral resource Gwede Mantashe during a walkabout in Charlesville to inspect the damage caused to homes after the mudslide from the Jagersfontein Development mine dam damaged houses and infrastructure.
Image: Thulani Mbele

Minister of mineral resources and energy Gwede Mantashe says his department will do all it can to help the community of Jagersfontein in the Free State, despite a 2007 court ruling that exempts it from doing so.

This comes after the tailings dam disaster at the weekend in which at least one person was killed, several were injured and cars, houses and livestock were washed away. At least two people remain unaccounted for.

Mantashe held a briefing on Tuesday in the small mining town and conducted a site visit to the disaster-hit area.

Jagersfontein residents look at the damage caused by the mine's tailings dam wall collapse.
Jagersfontein residents look at the damage caused by the mine's tailings dam wall collapse.
Image: GCIS
This disaster is forcing us to revisit the judgment because we see it as judicial overreach. What they did with that judgment was to split the mine into the mining area, the dam and the slime dams, and from where we are seated that is complex.
Gwede Mantashe, mineral resources and energy minister

“We are running the risk of being in contempt of court. People in this community will remember in December 2007 there was a judgment,” Mantashe said. 

He was referring to a high court ruling involving the Jagersfontein mine’s previous owner, De Beers, and Ataqua Mining. 

SowetanLIVE's sister publication BusinessLIVE reported the court found minerals already mined and deposited as waste in tailings dams are the property of the owners of the processing plant. The issue at the time was whether tailings dumps should be considered minerals governed by the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, with ownership vesting under the custodianship of the state.

Mantashe said the judgment indicated slime dams were not part of his department but the responsibility of the water affairs department. Despite this, his department would not turn its back on the affected community, he said.

He held a closed meeting with the company managing the dam and was expected to brief journalists after the meeting.

Mantashe said his department could offer technical support.

“It is an area we understand. It is an area within our responsibility. We will be working with water affairs and everybody else, but we will not move out of here when there is a disaster,” he said.

“Our view is that this disaster is forcing us to revisit that judgment because we see it as judicial overreach. What they did with that judgment was to split the mine into the mining area, the dam and the slime dams, and from where we are seated that is complex.

Legal compliance representative at Jagersfontein Development Marius de Villiers denied that the mine ignored a directive by the Free State department of water and sanitation, ordering them to stop operations at the mine after it was found that the waste water volumes were higher than what was permitted.

"After we received that directive, we stopped operations and then we reapplied for a new operating license which we were granted. So we complied," he said.

"We will have to wait for the inquiry to determine whether the mine will be taking full responsibility of rebuilding the homes that were damaged."


Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.